B

Abshire Smith

5/10

Evans and Partners

6/10
7/10WinnerRegulation5/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while Evans and Partners was established in 2012 and is based in USA. Abshire Smith holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while Evans and Partners is regulated by Unregulated among others. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Evans and Partners has 10,000+. Both brokers share the same minimum deposit of $500.

Evans and Partners wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithEvans and Partners
Min. Deposit$500$500
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA)Unregulated
Founded19972012
CountryUnited kingdomUSA
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and Evans and Partners, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Both require a minimum deposit of $500. Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Evans and Partners applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Abshire Smith does not. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; Evans and Partners does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithEvans and Partners
Min. Deposit$500$500
Withdrawal FeesNoNo
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesNo
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Evans and Partners supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Abshire Smith supports social and copy trading features, which Evans and Partners does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithEvans and Partners
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMetaTrader 4, cTrader PlatformMetaTrader 4,MetaTrader 5

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and Evans and Partners compare. Evans and Partners runs regular live webinars; Abshire Smith does not. Evans and Partners has a video library; Abshire Smith does not. Evans and Partners publishes daily market commentary; Abshire Smith does not. Evans and Partners integrates third-party research tools (Trading Central, Autochartist); Abshire Smith does not. Evans and Partners maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. Evans and Partners scores higher overall in education and research.

Evans and Partners wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithEvans and Partners
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoYes
Weekly WebinarsNoYes
Daily CommentaryNoYes
Trading CentralNoYes
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Evans and Partners supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithEvans and Partners
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and Evans and Partners offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithEvans and Partners
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese