B

Abshire Smith

5/10

City Of Investment

5.1/10
7/10WinnerRegulation5/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsTied4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while City Of Investment was established in 2009 and is based in United Kingdom. Abshire Smith holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while City Of Investment is regulated by Financial Markets Authority (FMA) among others. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; City Of Investment has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Abshire Smith and $3000 at City Of Investment.

City Of Investment wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithCity Of Investment
Min. Deposit$500$3000
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA)Financial Markets Authority (FMA)
Founded19972009
CountryUnited kingdomUnited Kingdom
Clients10,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and City Of Investment, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. City Of Investment has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $3000 (vs $500 at Abshire Smith). City Of Investment charges withdrawal fees while Abshire Smith does not, giving Abshire Smith an edge for frequent withdrawers. City Of Investment applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Abshire Smith does not. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; City Of Investment does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithCity Of Investment
Min. Deposit$500$3000
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesNoYes
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesNoYes

Platforms

Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while City Of Investment supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Abshire Smith supports social and copy trading features, which City Of Investment does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithCity Of Investment
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMetaTrader 4, cTrader PlatformAndroid Apps,iPhone/iPad,Desktop

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and City Of Investment compare. City Of Investment has a video library; Abshire Smith does not. City Of Investment integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Abshire Smith does not. City Of Investment scores higher overall in education and research.

City Of Investment wins this category
FeatureAbshire SmithCity Of Investment
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while City Of Investment supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithCity Of Investment
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoNo
SkrillNoNo
NetellerNoNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and City Of Investment offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAbshire SmithCity Of Investment
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, and Chinese