Abshire Smith
Boston Merchant Financial
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while Boston Merchant Financial was established in 1988 and is based in Dubai. Abshire Smith holds licences including Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while Boston Merchant Financial is regulated by Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) among others. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; Boston Merchant Financial has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Abshire Smith and $50 at Boston Merchant Financial.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Boston Merchant Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $500 | $50 |
| Regulation | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) |
| Founded | 1997 | 1988 |
| Country | United kingdom | Dubai |
| Clients | 10,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and Boston Merchant Financial, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Boston Merchant Financial has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $50 (vs $500 at Abshire Smith). Neither broker charges withdrawal fees. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; Boston Merchant Financial does not. Overall, Boston Merchant Financial scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Boston Merchant Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $500 | $50 |
| Withdrawal Fees | No | No |
| Inactivity Fees | No | No |
| Deposit Fees | Yes | No |
| CFD Fees | No | No |
Platforms
Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while Boston Merchant Financial supports MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. Abshire Smith edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Boston Merchant Financial |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | No |
| MT5 | Yes | Yes |
| cTrader | Yes | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MetaTrader 4, cTrader Platform | MT4, Web Trader, Tablet & Mobile apps |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and Boston Merchant Financial compare. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Boston Merchant Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | No |
| CFD Education | No | No |
| Weekly Webinars | No | No |
| Daily Commentary | No | No |
| Trading Central | No | No |
| Autochartist | No | No |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while Boston Merchant Financial supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Boston Merchant Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | No | No |
| Skrill | No | No |
| Neteller | No | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and Boston Merchant Financial offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 2 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | Abshire Smith | Boston Merchant Financial |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, and Chinese | English, and Chinese |