B

Abshire Smith

5/10
amarkets logo

amarkets

7.6/10
7/10RegulationWinner10/10
0/10FeesTied0/10
9/10PlatformsTied9/10
0/10Education & ResearchWinner4/10
4/10Deposits & WithdrawalsWinner10/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

Abshire Smith was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in United kingdom, while amarkets was established in 2016 and is based in United Kingdom. Both brokers are regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), among other authorities. Abshire Smith serves 10,000+ clients worldwide; amarkets has 1,000,000+. The minimum deposit is $500 at Abshire Smith and $250 at amarkets.

amarkets wins this category
FeatureAbshire Smithamarkets
Min. Deposit$500$250
RegulationFinancial Conduct Authority (FCA)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F223
Founded19972016
CountryUnited kingdomUnited Kingdom
Clients10,000+1,000,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between Abshire Smith and amarkets, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. amarkets has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $500 at Abshire Smith). amarkets charges withdrawal fees while Abshire Smith does not, giving Abshire Smith an edge for frequent withdrawers. Abshire Smith charges deposit fees; amarkets does not. The two brokers are broadly comparable on fee structure.

Tied
FeatureAbshire Smithamarkets
Min. Deposit$500$250
Withdrawal FeesNoYes
Inactivity FeesNoNo
Deposit FeesYesYes
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

Abshire Smith offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, while amarkets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Abshire Smith supports social and copy trading features, which amarkets does not offer. The two brokers are closely matched on platform offering.

Tied
FeatureAbshire Smithamarkets
MT4YesYes
MT5YesYes
cTraderYesYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMetaTrader 4, cTrader PlatformMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how Abshire Smith and amarkets compare. amarkets has a video library; Abshire Smith does not. amarkets integrates third-party research tools (Autochartist); Abshire Smith does not. amarkets scores higher overall in education and research.

amarkets wins this category
FeatureAbshire Smithamarkets
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationNoNo
Weekly WebinarsNoNo
Daily CommentaryNoNo
Trading CentralNoNo
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. Abshire Smith accepts 2 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card), while amarkets supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). amarkets uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. amarkets scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

amarkets wins this category
FeatureAbshire Smithamarkets
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalNoYes
SkrillNoYes
NetellerNoYes

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both Abshire Smith and amarkets offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Abshire Smith supports 2 languages and amarkets supports 8, giving amarkets broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureAbshire Smithamarkets
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, and ChineseEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic