aaafx
Invast Global
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
aaafx was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in United States, while Invast Global was established in 1960 and is based in Australia. aaafx holds licences including HCMC (Greece), while Invast Global is regulated by Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) among others. aaafx serves 60,000+ clients worldwide; Invast Global has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $300 at aaafx and $25000 at Invast Global.
| Feature | aaafx | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $300 | $25000 |
| Regulation | HCMC (Greece), FSA (St Vincent & Grenadines) | Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) |
| Founded | 2007 | 1960 |
| Country | United States | Australia |
| Clients | 60,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between aaafx and Invast Global, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. Invast Global has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $25000 (vs $300 at aaafx). aaafx charges withdrawal fees while Invast Global does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. aaafx applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; Invast Global does not. Overall, Invast Global scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | aaafx | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $300 | $25000 |
| Withdrawal Fees | Yes | No |
| Inactivity Fees | Yes | No |
| Deposit Fees | No | No |
| CFD Fees | No | No |
Platforms
aaafx offers MT4, while Invast Global supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. aaafx supports social and copy trading features, which Invast Global does not offer. Invast Global edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.
| Feature | aaafx | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | Yes |
| MT5 | No | Yes |
| cTrader | No | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps | MT4, |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how aaafx and Invast Global compare. aaafx runs regular live webinars; Invast Global does not. Both provide video tutorials. aaafx publishes daily market commentary; Invast Global does not. Both integrate third-party research tools. aaafx maintains an archive of past webinars for on-demand viewing. aaafx scores higher overall in education and research.
| Feature | aaafx | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | Yes |
| CFD Education | Yes | No |
| Weekly Webinars | Yes | No |
| Daily Commentary | Yes | No |
| Trading Central | Yes | No |
| Autochartist | No | Yes |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. aaafx accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while Invast Global supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). aaafx uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. aaafx scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.
| Feature | aaafx | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | Yes | No |
| Skrill | Yes | No |
| Neteller | Yes | No |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both aaafx and Invast Global offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. aaafx supports 8 languages and Invast Global supports 2, giving aaafx broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | aaafx | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic | English, and Chinese |