B

aaafx

5.6/10

IKON Finance

7.5/10
5/10RegulationWinner8/10
0/10FeesWinner6/10
6/10PlatformsWinner9/10
6/10Education & ResearchWinner10/10
10/10WinnerDeposits & Withdrawals4/10
10/10SupportTied10/10

BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.

Overview

aaafx was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in United States, while IKON Finance was established in 2011 and is based in London. aaafx holds licences including HCMC (Greece), while IKON Finance is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. aaafx serves 60,000+ clients worldwide; IKON Finance has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $300 at aaafx and $200 at IKON Finance.

IKON Finance wins this category
FeatureaaafxIKON Finance
Min. Deposit$300$200
RegulationHCMC (Greece), FSA (St Vincent & Grenadines)Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Founded20072011
CountryUnited StatesLondon
Clients60,000+10,000+

Fees

Fees are a critical factor when choosing between aaafx and IKON Finance, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. IKON Finance has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $200 (vs $300 at aaafx). aaafx charges withdrawal fees while IKON Finance does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. Both brokers charge inactivity fees on dormant accounts, worth noting if you trade infrequently. Overall, IKON Finance scores higher on fees in our assessment.

IKON Finance wins this category
FeatureaaafxIKON Finance
Min. Deposit$300$200
Withdrawal FeesYesNo
Inactivity FeesYesYes
Deposit FeesNoNo
CFD FeesNoNo

Platforms

aaafx offers MT4, while IKON Finance supports MT4, MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. aaafx supports social and copy trading features, which IKON Finance does not offer. IKON Finance edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.

IKON Finance wins this category
FeatureaaafxIKON Finance
MT4YesYes
MT5NoYes
cTraderNoYes
Windows AppYesYes
iOS AppYesYes
Android AppYesYes
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile appsMT4, ZuluTrade, Tablet & Mobile apps

Education & Research

Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how aaafx and IKON Finance compare. Both brokers run regular live webinars. Both provide video tutorials, including advanced content. Daily market commentary is available from both brokers. Both integrate third-party research tools including Trading Central. Archived webinars are available at both brokers for self-paced learning. IKON Finance scores higher overall in education and research.

IKON Finance wins this category
FeatureaaafxIKON Finance
Forex EducationNoYes
CFD EducationYesYes
Weekly WebinarsYesYes
Daily CommentaryYesYes
Trading CentralYesYes
AutochartistNoYes

Deposits & Withdrawals

Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. aaafx accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while IKON Finance supports 2 (bank transfer, credit/debit card). aaafx uniquely supports PayPal and Skrill and Neteller among the two brokers. aaafx scores higher on deposit and withdrawal flexibility.

aaafx wins this category
FeatureaaafxIKON Finance
Bank TransferYesYes
Credit CardYesYes
PayPalYesNo
SkrillYesNo
NetellerYesNo

Support

Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both aaafx and IKON Finance offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. aaafx supports 8 languages and IKON Finance supports 2, giving aaafx broader global reach. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.

Tied
FeatureaaafxIKON Finance
Live ChatYesYes
Phone SupportYesYes
Email SupportYesYes
LanguagesEnglish, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and ArabicEnglish, and Chinese