aaafx
fbs inc
BrokerDataNet earns affiliate commission from brokers listed on this site. This does not affect our ratings or editorial independence.
Overview
aaafx was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in United States, while fbs inc was established in 2018 and is based in Australia. aaafx holds licences including HCMC (Greece), while fbs inc is regulated by Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) among others. aaafx serves 60,000+ clients worldwide; fbs inc has 10,000+. The minimum deposit is $300 at aaafx and $250 at fbs inc.
| Feature | aaafx | fbs inc |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $300 | $250 |
| Regulation | HCMC (Greece), FSA (St Vincent & Grenadines) | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), Pepperstone Markets Limited is incorporated in The Bahamas (number 177174 B), Licensed by the Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) number SIA-F225 |
| Founded | 2007 | 2018 |
| Country | United States | Australia |
| Clients | 60,000+ | 10,000+ |
Fees
Fees are a critical factor when choosing between aaafx and fbs inc, directly affecting your bottom line as a trader. fbs inc has a lower barrier to entry with a minimum deposit of $250 (vs $300 at aaafx). aaafx charges withdrawal fees while fbs inc does not, a notable advantage for frequent withdrawers. aaafx applies inactivity fees on dormant accounts; fbs inc does not. Overall, fbs inc scores higher on fees in our assessment.
| Feature | aaafx | fbs inc |
|---|---|---|
| Min. Deposit | $300 | $250 |
| Withdrawal Fees | Yes | No |
| Inactivity Fees | Yes | No |
| Deposit Fees | No | No |
| CFD Fees | No | No |
Platforms
aaafx offers MT4, while fbs inc supports MT5, cTrader. Both brokers provide mobile trading apps for iOS and Android. Both brokers support copy or social trading, catering to less hands-on investors. fbs inc edges ahead on platform breadth and functionality in our scoring.
| Feature | aaafx | fbs inc |
|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Yes | No |
| MT5 | No | Yes |
| cTrader | No | Yes |
| Windows App | Yes | Yes |
| iOS App | Yes | Yes |
| Android App | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps | MT4, MT5, Mac, ZuluTrade, Web Trader, cTrader, Tablet & Mobile apps |
Education & Research
Education and research tools help traders at every level make more informed decisions, and here's how aaafx and fbs inc compare. Both brokers run regular live webinars. Both provide video tutorials, including advanced content. Daily market commentary is available from both brokers. Both integrate third-party research tools including Trading Central. Archived webinars are available at both brokers for self-paced learning. The two brokers are evenly matched on educational content.
| Feature | aaafx | fbs inc |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Education | No | No |
| CFD Education | Yes | Yes |
| Weekly Webinars | Yes | Yes |
| Daily Commentary | Yes | Yes |
| Trading Central | Yes | Yes |
| Autochartist | No | No |
Deposits & Withdrawals
Convenient deposit and withdrawal options reduce friction for traders, especially important when managing positions across time zones. aaafx accepts 5 of the tracked payment methods (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller), while fbs inc supports 5 (bank transfer, credit/debit card, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller). Both brokers support the same set of payment methods.
| Feature | aaafx | fbs inc |
|---|---|---|
| Bank Transfer | Yes | Yes |
| Credit Card | Yes | Yes |
| PayPal | Yes | Yes |
| Skrill | Yes | Yes |
| Neteller | Yes | Yes |
Support
Responsive customer support matters most when you're locked out of your account or need urgent help with a trade. Both aaafx and fbs inc offer live chat support. Both provide phone support. Email support is available at both brokers. Both brokers offer support in 8 languages. Both brokers are comparable on support quality.
| Feature | aaafx | fbs inc |
|---|---|---|
| Live Chat | Yes | Yes |
| Phone Support | Yes | Yes |
| Email Support | Yes | Yes |
| Languages | English, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic | English, Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic |